Legal Opinion
West New York v. Bd. Pub. Utility Commrs
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided December 30, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This matter is now before the court on complainants' application for an order to require the defendant Public Service Co-ordinated Transport to show cause why a temporary injunction should not issue to restrain it from putting into effect on January 1st, 1930, an increased rate of fare for transportation of passengers on its street railways and buses, as per schedule filed November 21st, 1929, with the board of public utility commissioners, and to require said board to show cause why a temporary injunction should not issue to restrain it from permitting such increase of fare to take effect…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Citizens Coach Co. v. Camden Horse RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1878
- In Re HagueNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Earle v. American Sugar Refining Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
- Spoor-Thompson, C., Co. v. Bennett, C.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Joy v. WinsteadIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Illinois Cent. R. R. v. Miss. Public Service Comm.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Esplanade Amusement Co., Inc. v. Asbury ParkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
- New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Com'rsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1938