Fritz v. Gaudet
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
Upon due consideration of the evidence in the light of our established rule governing the trial court in granting a nonsuit in favor of Santti, we are of the opinion that the case ought to have been submitted to the jury. In Girard v. Grosvenordale Co., 83 Conn. 20, 25, 74 Atl. 1126, the court, by Chief Justice Baldwin, stated our rule to be: “In passing upon the motion, the Superior Court was bound to regard the truth of such of the evidence introduced by the plaintiff as went farthest in support of the complaint, as admitted, and to take into account every favorable inference that might…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cook v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Girard v. Grosvenordale Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Thomas v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Falker v. SamperiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.