Sheip v. Price, Page & Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 96, Nov,. T., 1896, by plaintiffs, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., March T., 1896, No. 343, making absolute rule to quash attachment. Attachment under act of March, 1869. Rule to quash attachment. The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was the order of the court making rule to quash the attachment absolute.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
This is an appeal from an order making absolute a rule to show *3cause why an attachment issued against the defendants under the act of March 17, 1869, (P. L. 9) should not be quashed. The rule was granted upon the application of the defendants and the trustee of certain judgment creditors supported by affidavit of the trustee that, although the writ purported to have been issued on the 29th day of February, 1896, the surety on the bond was not approved, and the affidavit and bond were not filed until March 2, 1896, “ as by reference to the record more fully appears,” and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoffman v. CosterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
- Simpson v. StackhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848
- Biddle v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
- Grieb v. KuttnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Pontius v. NesbitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grakelow v. NashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Laird v. Columbia Loan & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Gaston v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- In re SperringSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Specht v. SipeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.