Legal Opinion

McAlpin v. Duncan

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1860PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Twelfth District. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

Cope, J. concurring.

A question arises in this case as to the liability of a party making a contract for the building, etc., of a house, with a contractor. The defendant, Tevis, entered into a written contract with the defendant, Duncan, by which Duncan agreed to erect on the lot of Tevis a dwelling house, according to certain plans and specifications, at his own expense, he furnishing all the labor and materials, etc.; and Tevis agreed to pay him $11,850 in installments. This sum, together with other sums due Duncan for extra work, Tevis paid without notice of indebtedness of Duncan to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bottomly v. RectorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Knowles v. JoostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colter v. FreseIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Henry v. HindsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. McFadden v. StarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  5. Cutler & Parker v. McCormick, Hall & PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API