Legal Opinion

Dumphey v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1900Published

Mandamus by Edith Dumphey, as guardian of Azuba Dumphey, against Roscoe D. Dix, auditor general, and Joseph S. Hilton, to compel the former to cancel a tax deed.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Azuba Dumphey owned, and with her husband occupied, the premises in controversy in 1889, when the taxes, including a drain tax, were levied upon it. At the April term, 1892, of the circuit court for the county in which the lands are situate, the petition of the auditor general for a decree against delinquent tax lands was heard; Azuba Dumphey having been personally served with process, and, through a solicitor, having filed objections to the validity of the drain tax. Testimony was taken in open court, and the validity of the drain tax was sustained. In May, 1892, at an offering by the

*355county…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Auditor General v. SparrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Dumphey v. HiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Hilton v. DumpheyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Jenison v. ConklinMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API