Legal Opinion
Jane Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 9, 2024No. 22-16562PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JANE DOE, No. 22-16562 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-03310- v. JSC UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ORDER RASIER, LLC; RASIER CA, LLC, CERTIFYING QUESTION TO Defendants-Appellees. THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jacqueline S. Corley, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 14, 2023 San Jose, California Filed January 9, 2024 Before: Susan P. Graber, Richard A. Paez, and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges. Order 2 DOE V.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie Kirkland, Debtors. Security Pacific National Bank v. Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Mudpie, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Lugtu v. California Highway PatrolCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Key v. Qualcomm IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Akhmad, et al. v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Serenity Investments, LLC v. Sun Hung Kai Strategic Capital, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026