Legal Opinion

Akhmad, et al. v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 12, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00583Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 AKHMAD, et. al, Case No. 25-cv-00583-BAS-DEB 19 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART, 20 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 22) 21 BUMBLE BEE FOODS, LLC, 22 Defendant. 23 24 For the reasons discussed herein, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), the Court GRANTS 25 Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims for injunctive relief WITHOUT 26 PREJUDICE. However, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), the Court DENIES Defendant’s 27 motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Trafficking Victims…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API