Legal Opinion

Clanan v. Nushzno

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1933No. Docket No. 180, Calendar No. 36,800PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, C. J.

This is an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution based on a sworn complaint of defendant David Nushzno, in criminal proceedings wherein the plaintiff was charged with the embezzlement of money belonging to the defendant insurance company.

In February, 1921, David Nushzno was superintendent of a branch district of the John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company in the city of Detroit, Michig’an. The plaintiff was employed on a commission basis as agent to solicit insurance and to collect premiums. He worked out of Mr. Nushzno’s office in designated territory and was responsible to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weiden v. WeidenMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Gilecki v. DolembaMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Edward Coogan and Margaret Coogan v. City of Wixom, Bruce Kirby and Philip LeonardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  2. Rivers v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Gooch v. WachowiakMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Roblyer v. HoytMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Koski v. VohsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API