Legal Opinion

Klein Et Ux. v. Klein

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1933No. Appeal, 158PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

The two plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, and defendant and her husband, took a trip to Cleveland, Ohio, in defendant’s automobile. The two men were brothers, were each engaged in a branch of the automobile business, and their purpose in going to Cleveland was to attend an automobile accessories exhibition. Incidentally, defendant took the opportunity to visit an aunt who was residing there. Everything went along safely until after they left Erie, Pa., on their way home. While in that city, they met a lady friend, who was invited to and did return with them.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Scheel v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Double Et Ux. v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fox v. LavenderUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Breslin by Breslin v. RidarelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Richardson v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Beam v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Melmed v. MottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API