Double Et Ux. v. Myers
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Drew,
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from the action of the court below in refusing a new trial, after having directed a verdict for defendant. The sole question to determine is whether or not the trial judge was right in directing the verdict. The action was brought by plaintiffs, husband and wife, to recover damages from the defendant, and the following facts were developed by the plaintiffs at the trial:
At about 11:30 o’clock P. M. on March 31, 1928, one of the plaintiffs, Mrs. Double, was run into and seriously injured by an automobile owned by the defendant. She was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hartig v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Lotz v. HanlonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Holzheimer v. Lit Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Scheel v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Zavodnick v. Rose SonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Fox v. LavenderUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Readshaw Et Ux. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- White v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
- Breslin by Breslin v. RidarelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Marach v. KooistraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.