Legal Opinion

Coffin v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided June 19, 1928No. Docket Nos. 11556, 12498, 28049, 17002, 12944, 12945, 15996, 17856, 30377, 11558Published

Compensation paid to trustees of the Boston Elevated Railway Co. held exempt.

1Opinion of the Court

WINTHROP COFFIN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

STANLEY R. MILLER, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

JAMES J. JACKSON, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

J. FRANK O'HARE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

SAMUEL L. POWERS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Coffin v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 11556, 12498, 28049, 17002, 12944, 12945, 15996, 17856, 30377, 11558.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

12 B.T.A. 702; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3478;

June 19, 1928, Promulgated

Compensation…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API