Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 15, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.

W. W. Jennings and Herbert Glazebrook were charged in separate indictments with manufacturing distilled ardent spirits. By agreement, they were tried jointly. Both were convicted and the jury fixed the punishment of Jennings at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary and that of Glazebrook at a fine of $100 and six months’ confinement in jail.

There were three errors assigned, the first of which is urged by both Jennings and Glazebrook, the last two by Jennings alone. The assignments may be stated thus:(1) The refusal of the trial court to set aside the verdict because it was contrary to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McFarland v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Keeney v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  3. Langford v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  4. Hall v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EllettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  2. McCallister v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  3. Lunsford v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  4. Freddie W. Robinson, Jr. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API