Legal Opinion

McCallister v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 12, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The accused, J. R. McCallister, has been found guilty under an indictment which charged a violation of the prohibition law. There were two counts in the indictment. The first count charged that the accused “did unlawfully and feloniously manufacture ardent spirits,” and also alleged that the accused had, prior to the finding of the in*846dictment, been convicted upon a warrant charging a violation of the prohibition law, to-wit, having in possession and transporting ten gallons of ardent spirits. The second count, charging that the accused had a fire-arm in his possession at the place where the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keeney v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  2. Langford v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  3. Hudgins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  4. Jennings v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richard Lane v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  2. Harrison v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Tyson v. HeningSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API