Airtouch Paging v. Tracy
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Tyack, Judge.
On September 8, 1994, ten plaintiffs, companies involved in the “paging” industry, filed a complaint in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, naming as defendant Roger W. Tracy, the Tax Commissioner of Ohio (“commissioner”). The declaratory judgment action arose following receipt by the plaintiffs (“paging companies”) of a notice from the commissioner advising them that their property tax filing status had changed.
Specifically, the paging companies were informed that they would no longer be deemed “general taxpayers” for purposes of Ohio personal property taxation, pursuant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Commission of Webster Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001