Legal Opinion

Gibson, Inc. v. Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided September 25, 2026No. 4:19-cv-00358Unknown

1Opinion

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION GIBSON, INC., § § Plaintiff, § v. § § Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-358 ARMADILLO DISTRIBUTION § Judge Mazzant ENTERPRISES, INC. § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Gibson Brands, Inc.’s (“Gibson” or “Plaintiff”) Rule 54 Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (Dkt. #819) (the “Motion”). Having considered the Motion, the relevant pleadings, and the applicable law, the Court finds that Gibson Brands, Inc.’s Rule 54 Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (Dkt. #819) should be…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Pacheco v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  5. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. KellstromCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API