Gibson, Inc. v. Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION GIBSON, INC., § § Plaintiff, § v. § § Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-358 ARMADILLO DISTRIBUTION § Judge Mazzant ENTERPRISES, INC. § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Gibson Brands, Inc.’s (“Gibson” or “Plaintiff”) Rule 54 Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (Dkt. #819) (the “Motion”). Having considered the Motion, the relevant pleadings, and the applicable law, the Court finds that Gibson Brands, Inc.’s Rule 54 Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (Dkt. #819) should be…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Pacheco v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. KellstromCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.