Zapata v. Hartigan
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GRADY, District Judge.
This case is before us on plaintiffs motion for injunctive relief from prosecution and defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. We deny the former and grant the latter.
FACTS
Plaintiff Dr. Helio Zapata is a licensed obstetrician who has been practicing medicine in Illinois since 1971. On October 4, 1988, he was indicted for allegedly accepting “kickbacks” in violation of Ill.Rev.Stat. eh. 23, ¶ 8A-3(b) (1985) (“statute”).1 Plaintiff filed this action challenging the constitutionality of the statute, both on its face and as applied to him, and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.