Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Porter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 2012No. 557 CAPPublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*514 ORDER

Chief Justice CASTILLE.1

AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2012, upon review of Appellant’s Motion for Recusal and the Commonwealth’s Reply in Opposition to the Motion, the Motion for Recusal is DENIED.

OPINION

Appellant Ernest Porter, a death-sentenced prisoner, appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying as untimely his serial petition under the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546; the pleading raised a claim under Brady v. Maryland, 378 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).2 After the appeal was briefed on the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RykardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. Mason, L., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. RoneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. RiggSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Ernest Porter v. Pennsylvania Department of CorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API