Legal Opinion

Dennison v. Doreen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1978No. 76-0051, SC 25167PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDSON, J., Pro Tempore.

Defendants appeal the denial of their motion to set aside a decree based on an order of default. The decree awarded plaintiffs an equitable lien on defendants’ property involved in the suit. The motion was made on the grounds:

"1. That the defendants had no notice by the Summons and Complaint to make them aware that a decree would be entered against them for money, in that the decree awards relief different than that prayed for in the Complaint.
"2. That defendants failure to plead was based on excusable neglect.
"3. That defendants have a meritorious defense to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hiatt v. Congoleum Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Bella v. Aurora Air, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Lane County Escrow Service, Inc. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Burke v. RachauOregon Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burke v. Children's Services DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Johnson v. SteenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In re the Marriage of GilbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. In re the Marriage of HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API