First National Bank v. Village of Buhl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to enjoin defendants from carrying out a certain conspiracy and applying moneys of the village toward the payment of current claims. The return upon an order to show cause was heard by Dancer, J., who granted an injunction pendente lite. From the order granting the injunction, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
In 1920 the village of Buhl levied a tax of $350,000 for general municipal purposes. On April 21, 1921, chapter 417 of the Laws of 1921 took effect. By section 1, cities and villages were limited to $100 per cápita of population in levying taxes for municipal purposes in the year 1921 and in each year thereafter. The population of the village is 2,007, On June 6 the village council adopted the following resolution:
“Resolved that the village treasurer be instructed to call and pay all village warrants in all departments issued for debts incurred since April 21, 1921, and that all funds…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nicol v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Eidemiller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Johnson v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Kelly v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Naftalin v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Voorhees v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- First National Bank v. FordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940