Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Brinson

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 30, 1998No. 97-1008; Crim.App. No. S29228Published

1ConcurrenceCox, Chief Judge

I concur in the opinion of my colleague, Judge Sullivan. I write separately to answer some of the questions raised by Judge Crawford. First, it cannot be gainsaid that the language used on the night in question was gross, vulgar, and profane. Neither can it be denied that such outrageous reaction and disrespect to the security police performing their legitimate duties were, under the circumstances present here, punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

The question presented, however, is more narrow and academic. It is not whether gross, vulgar profanity can be punished under the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. BivinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  5. United States v. LinyearU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API