Legal Opinion
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. Casio Computer Co.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided December 5, 2012No. Case No. 6:12-cv-274-Orl-36DABPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court upon Defendant Casio Computer Co., Ltd.’s *1340(“Casio” or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss Claims of Joint, Indirect and Willful Infringement (“Motion to Dismiss”) (Doc. 14). Plaintiff Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC (“Brandywine” or “Plaintiff’) filed a Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (“Response”) (Doc. 23), to which Casio replied (Doc. 27). The Motion to Dismiss is ripe for review. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Facts1
Brandywine…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Quality Foods De Centro America, S.A. And Duroparts De El Salvador, S.A. v. Latin American Agribusiness Development Corporation, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- United Technologies Corp. v. MazerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zond, Inc. v. Fujitsu Semiconductor Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Veracode, Inc. v. Appthority, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Englishtown, Inc. v. Rosetta Stone Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Trove Brands, LLC v. JH Studios, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2020