Legal Opinion

Pomerantz v. Pennsylvania-Dixie Cement Corp.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 20, 1931No. 40788PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoruno, J.

The petition as it stood at the time of the submission .of the case to the jury alleged “that * * plaintiff at the invitation, insistence and request of said defendant’s agents went onto and upon the premises of the said defendant corporation and while, walking on the regular laid out path * * * for the purpose and intent of carrying out the instructions of the defendant’s agents, as given him, the said plaintiff stepped into a mound of ashes which were in the path and in the road of his walking and which from all appearance, were placed there for the purpose of passing and walking over the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grinde v. M. & St. P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Hanen v. LenanderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Scott v. HoganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. White v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kirchner v. Dorsey DorseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. Pomerantz v. Pennsylvania-Dixie Cement Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Jolley v. Martin Bros. Box Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API