Legal Opinion

Grinde v. M. & St. P. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 22, 1876PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Winneshiek District Court. Plaintiff alleges in his petition that he was the owner of a certain cow, which casually strayed upon the track of defendant’s road. That said defendant by its agents and servants did run and manage one of their engines in such a grossly negligent and careless manner, that the same ran against and over said cow and hilled her.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Winneshiek District Court. Plaintiff alleges in his petition that he was the owner of a certain cow, which casually strayed upon the track of defendant’s road. That said defendant by its agents and servants did run and manage one of their engines in such a grossly negligent and careless manner, that the same ran against and over said cow and hilled her. Defendant moved for a more specific statement, claiming that the allegation of negligence is so general, indefinite and uncertain, that the jirecise nature of the charge is not apparent. Motion overruled; defendant excepted, and…

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

We are of opinion that the petition is sufficiently specific. It does not follow, because negligence is a mixed question of law and fact, that the general allegation is pleading a legal conclusion only. The facts necessary to be pleaded are not merely physical facts. It is not allowable to jilead mere abstract conclusions of law, having no element of fact; they form no jiart of the allegations constituting a cause of action; but if they contain the elements also of a fact, construing the language in its ordinary meaning, then force and effect must be given to them as allegations of fact, as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oldfield v. . the N.Y. and Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Nolton v. . Western Railroad CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1857

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Cederson v. Oregon Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Clark v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Orr v. Des Moines Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API