American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Brock
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
Reduced to their last analysis, the questions presented by the record in this certiorari are only two in number. The first involves the proper construction of the language employed in section 34 of the Georgia workmen’s compensation act (Ga. L. 1920, p. 167) on page 186. The second question is raised by the contention presented in the petition for certiorari, that the courts upon appeal can consider and review only the adequacy or inadequacy of the amount awarded in case of a compensable injury when and after the Industrial Commission has determined as a matter of fact the degree of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
3Cited by19 opinions
- Peninsular Life Insurance v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Dunn v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Wisham v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Richardson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Barry v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.