Legal Opinion
Peninsular Life Insurance v. Brand
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 17, 1938No. 26588PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
Where under Code, §§ 114-707, 114-708— (workmen’s-compensation act), a single “director” has a hearing and finds certain preliminary facts (or comes to certain preliminary conclusions), and then, from these preliminary facts, finds the ultimate fact which is the issue on trial, and thus makes an award, upon a review of such an award by all the directors of the Department of Industrial Relations, whether the evidence be the same or there be additional evidence, they may find any one or all of the preliminary facts, or the ultimate fact, to be the same as found by the single “ director,” or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. EnglandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Southeastern Express Co. v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Independence Indemnity Co. v. SprayberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Montgomery v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Savannah River Lumber Co. v. BushCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. SissonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Pacific Employers Insurance Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Hartford Accident Indemnity Company v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Thompson-Weinman Co. v. YanceyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.