Legal Opinion

People v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 21, 2015No. Supreme Court Case 13SC495PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rice

{1 This case requires us to decide whether Respondent Shannon Nelson may receive. a refund of costs, fees, and restitution that she paid following a conviction. Nelson's convietion was overturned and she was acquitted after a new trial. We hold that a trial court may not authorize a refund of costs, fees, or restitution following a eriminal trial without statutory authority. Because none of the statutes governing the fines, fees, and restitution empowered the trial court to issue a refund, it could not do so. Exonerated defendants may seek a refund of costs, fees, and restitution, but only…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Climax Molybdenum Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. People v. MilneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Martinez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  5. A.S. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nelson v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. The People of the State of Colorado v. Benjamin WeeksSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  3. Commonwealth v. Martinez Commonwealth v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  4. People v. MaddenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  5. State v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API