Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hobbs

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 9, 1929No. 20, OriginalPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

- This is a petition for a writ of mandamus directing Judge Pollock, of the District Court of the United States for the District of Kansas, to call to his assistance two other Judges under § 266 of the Judicial Code as amended, (U. S. Code, Title 28, § 380,) to determine the prayer, for interlocutory and final injunctions against the petitioners in certain suits. An order to show cause was issued and the Judge has made a return. We are of opinion that the writ must be denied upon the incontrovertible portions of the return, and therefore need to consider nothing else.

One hundred and fifty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Ex Parte BuderSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Moore v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Turner v. FoucheSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ex Parte BransfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Oklahoma Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API