Legal Opinion

Hensley v. McBride

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1931No. Docket No. 7747PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff sought to recover damages for an injury sustained when bitten by a dog belonging to defendants. The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury and from a judgment in favor of plaintiff defendants appeal.

Plaintiff alleged in her complaint that the dog was of “vicious disposition and dangerous character, and evilly disposed toward human beings and other dogs, and accustomed to attack them without provocation, all of which matters were well known to defendants.” The court found that the dog was of a “mischievous disposition and of a dangerous character, and evilly disposed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Halminska v. KoblerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fowler v. HelckCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Menches v. Inglewood Humane SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Johnson v. McMahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Perkins v. DruryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API