Legal Opinion

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated v. ZeaVision LLC

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided August 31, 2022No. 4:22-cv-00914Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED, et al, Plaintiffs, Case # 20-CV-06452-FPG v. DECISION AND ORDER ZEAVISION LLC, Defendant. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (“Bausch & Lomb”) and PF Consumer Healthcare 1 LLC (“PF Consumer Healthcare 1”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this

35 U.S.C. § 271

action against Defendant ZeaVision LLC (“ZeaVision” or “Defendant”) for alleged infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,660,297 and 8,603,522 (collectively, the “Patents-in-Suit”). ECF Nos. 1, 21. In response, Defendant filed a Motion to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. D.H. Blair & Co. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Brunette MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Kockum Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corp. v. Ringside, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API