Commonwealth v. Ware
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Roberts,
The Commonwealth in this appeal calls upon this Court to hold the federal constitutional standards of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602 (1966), inapplicable to a 1963 confession sought to be introduced in a post-Miranda trial. This contention must be rejected. It ignores the controlling and unambiguous pronouncements of the United States Supreme Court concerning the extent of Miranda’s retroactivity. These pronouncements have been scrupulously followed not only by an unbroken line of decisions of this Court1 but also by virtually every other court…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- People v. DisbrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. TarbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.