Legal Opinion

Keyes v. Brush

New York Court of Chancery

Decided November 16, 1830PublishedCited by 14 opinions

This was a motion' to dissolve the injunction, heretofore issued in this cause, restraining the defendant from collecting or selling, assigning and transferring certain debts, choses in action, goods and other property assigned to the complainant to indemnify him as endorser and security for the defendant, and' to pay off the debts for which the complainant had become responsible. ',

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The defendant is under a mistake in supposing that the assignment of the 26th of May, 1830, Was inoperative in consequence of his neglect or refusal to make out and annex thereto a schedule or inventory of the property and effects assigned. The assignment was absolute and conveyed a present interest to the complainant in all the property, choses in action, and effects of the defendant. The part of the agreement relied on by the defendant as condi*312tional, after making an absolute grant and conveyances of all the property, effects and choses in action of the defendant of every…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cummings v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
  2. Hollister v. LoudMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Moir v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  4. First National Bank v. HughesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Jones v. McPhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API