Legal Opinion

United States v. Glen Alan Brogan

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1975No. 75-1156PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon consideration of the briefs, the arguments of counsel and the record we are of the opinion that it was discretionary with the District Court whether to allow or to deny Brogan’s motion to withdraw his plea of nolo contendere to a charge of conspiracy to manufacture counterfeit notes.

The Court, in denying Brogan’s motion, did not abuse its discretion. United States v. Vallejo, 476 F.2d 667, 671 (3d Cir. 1973). Brogan was sentenced to three months’ imprisonment, to be followed by 21 months’ probation and a fine of $5,000.

*29Brogan had been indicted along with four other codefendants. All of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. Thomas Peter Vallejo Appeal of David MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. J. C. RexCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. KerelukCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. BillupsOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. (PC) Bernal v. BeardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. State v. FrancisOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. United States v. Glen Alan BroganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API