Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Guilford County

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 27, 1910PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Ward,, J., at March Term, 1910, of Guilford. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Tbe plaintiff is a member of tbe Board of County Commissioners of Guilfor d. By direction of said board, be inspected a bridge over a stream where it crossed tbe public road, and made a report to the board recommending tbe rebuilding of said bridge, and demanded payment in tbe sum of $3 for one day spent in said service and 80 cents mileage. This action was tried upon an appeal from a justice of tbe peace, and judgment was rendered upon “case agreed.”

The principle involved is an exceedingly important one, both in morals and to tbe public welfare. Under Rev., 2785, as it was originally, before…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Minneapolis v. CanterburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Lexington Insulation Company v. Davidson CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Kendall v. . StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Terrell v. Town of TempeArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Town of Carolina Beach v. MintzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API