Legal Opinion
Jillson v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 14, 1963No. Civ. 10631PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Margaret F. Jilison filed an application with the Supervisors of the County of Sacramento sitting as a board of equalization for the reduction of the assessment on her property. The matter was heard and at the conclusion of the hearing the application for the reduction of the assessment was denied. Mrs. Jillson then sought a petition for a writ of mandate or a writ of review (certiorari) in the superior court. The basis of her claim for the use of one of the extraordinary writs, rather than pursuit of her remedy at law, was that she had been denied a fair hearing as required by the due…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dows v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- County of Sacramento v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Kahn v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Cohan v. AlvordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Tieberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.