Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Reynolds v. Price

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 1, 1911No. 7890Published

Before Gage, J., Sumter, September, 1909. Action by Mark Reynolds against Margaret O. Price. Plaintiff appeals. cite: The act, secs. 2375-9 of Code, modifies existing law: 1 Jones on Mtg. 954; 81 Mo. 94; 158 Mo. 622. Tender should be kept good to avail: 17 S. C. 329; 20 S. C. 521; 116 N. C. 1; 33 R. R. A. 231. A tender to get an assignment is not gopd: 115 U. S. 445; 1 Jones on Mtg., sec. 900; 70 N. Y. 553; 49 Mich. 27, 93; 3 R. R. A. 92; 47 Mich. 27; 30 Mich. 149; 1 Jones,…

Read the full summary

Before Gage, J., Sumter, September, 1909. Action by Mark Reynolds against Margaret O. Price. Plaintiff appeals. cite: The act, secs. 2375-9 of Code, modifies existing law: 1 Jones on Mtg. 954; 81 Mo. 94; 158 Mo. 622. Tender should be kept good to avail: 17 S. C. 329; 20 S. C. 521; 116 N. C. 1; 33 R. R. A. 231. A tender to get an assignment is not gopd: 115 U. S. 445; 1 Jones on Mtg., sec. 900; 70 N. Y. 553; 49 Mich. 27, 93; 3 R. R. A. 92; 47 Mich. 27; 30 Mich. 149; 1 Jones, sec. 900; 70 N. Y. 553; 25 Cyc. 1408-9; 37 Fed. R/286; 33 L. R. A. 234; 20 Ency. 1063; 38 Ency. 16; 77 Am. Dec. 489; 86…

1ConcurrenceJustice Woods

While I concur in holding that there has never been any legal tender of the mortgage debt and that the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment of foreclosure, I am unable to resist the conclusion that the legal propositions laid down in the majority opinion are opposed to the former decisions of this Court and contrary to the statute law of the State. The importance of the question seems to require a statement of my reasons for this conclusion.

In this action to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendant to the plaintiff on real estate in the city of Sumter, the defense set up was discharge of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kortright v. . CadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Renard v. ClinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Murray v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Crain v. McGoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Salinas & Son v. EllisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API