Legal Opinion

Terminal Drilling Co. v. Jones

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 2, 1928No. 12,111PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON application for supersedeas. Defendants in error as plaintiffs below obtained a decree foreclosing liens claimed by them for labor in connection with the drilling of a well sunk for the purpose of exploring for oil. Under the decree, foreclosure was ordered not only upon the well itself, but upon the fee estate, the leasehold estate, and the drilling rig, equipment and tools. Plaintiffs in error had various interests in the properties so included in the decree, as will more particularly hereinafter be set forth.

Peter K. Orrison was the owner of 160 acres of land in Adams county. December…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cosfriff Bros. v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Denver Circle R. v. NestorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  3. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  4. Wilkins v. AbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  5. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thiele v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. People Ex Rel. Palmer v. National Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Gearhart-Owen Industries, Inc. v. Panhandle Production Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Bickerton v. Vaughn, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1940
  5. Lierz v. CookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API