Legal Opinion

Benziger Bros. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 19, 1926No. 2758PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

Certain crucifixes, the typical samples of which were found by the board to measure in length one and one-fourth, one and one-half, and one and three-fourths inches, respectively, constitute the imported merchandise. Each crucifix has attached to the top a small ring by which it might be fastened to the person, to a rosary, or to other things. Base metal is the component material of chief value. These crucifixes are sometimes referred to in the record as crosses which, manifestly, they are not, one difference between a crucifix and a cross being that the former has the figure of Christ…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Closson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. MalhamiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Kennedy v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. J. Orlando Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. Panation Trade Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Whittemore Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  5. Ajax Findings Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API