Louisville N. R. Co. v. Malchow
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
Plaintiff (appellee) sued to recover damages, for that defendant (we quote from original count 5 of the complaint), “acting through its agents and servants, * * * wrongfully * * * cut the pipe line .of plaintiff which carried water from the waterworks of the city of Cullman, Ala., to his factory,” etc., and was allowed to recover in the trial court.
Plaintiff’s contention was that the pipe line had been laid for its own use by the Cullman Coal & Coke Company, and that he had purchased the line from that company. And, further, plaintiff contended that the traveled way along the course of which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Kern River Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. StringhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Clark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
- Southern Railway Co. v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
- Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. McFrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- City of Birmingham v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.