Legal Opinion

Abbas v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 21, 2015No. 15-229CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se; Rule 12(bXl), Subject-Matter Jurisdiction; Rule 12(b)(6), Failure to State a Claim; Fifth Amendment Takings; Seventh Amendment.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LYDIA KAY GRIGGSBY, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff pro se, Hassan Abbas, brought this action alleging a takings of his right to enforce certain unvalidated German bearer bonds in United States courts, in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and alleging a violation of his right to trial by jury under the Seventh Amendment of the United States Constitution. See generally Compl. The government has moved…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abbas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. Bigelow v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  3. Weir v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API