Legal Opinion

Eng v. Opperman

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 2025No. A170737Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 12/19/25; Certified for Publication 12/22/25 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO MARTIN ENG, et al., Plaintiffs, A170737, A171745 v. CRAIG OPPERMAN, et al. (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 21CIV06544) Defendants, Cross- Complainants, and Appellants; PORTOLA RANCH ASSOCIATION, INC., Cross-defendant and Respondent. Craig and Michelle Opperman (when referred to collectively, the Oppermans) applied to their homeowner’s association to construct an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on their property. The Portola Valley Ranch…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Levandusky v. One Fifth Avenue Apartment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  3. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  4. McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Intel Corp. v. HamidiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API