Legal Opinion

Stein Bros. Mfg. Co. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 11, 1963No. 389-59PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This contract case was referred to trial commissioner C. Murray Bernhardt, pursuant to Rule 45(a), for findings of fact and a recommendation for a conclusion of law. The commissioner has filed his-report containing an opinion, proposed findings of fact, and a recommended conclusion of law. He would hold that the plaintiff is entitled to recover, with recovery to be determined under Rule 38 (c) . The plaintiff accepts the commissioner’s opinion and proposed legal conclusion, and offers only minor objection to certain of the findings. The defendant excepts to the commissioner’s opinion, his…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. John Kelley Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kaiser Industries Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Terminal Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. C. J. Montag & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API