Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 26, 2001No. 3-00-0153WCPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman

The claimant, Mark Pearson, filed an application for adjustment of claim under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 1994)), seeking benefits for injuries he received on October 7, 1994, while assisting firefighters from the Clover Township Fire Protection District (District) in putting out a farm field fire. Following a hearing, an arbitrator issued a decision denying the claimant benefits under the Act, finding that no employer/employee relationship existed between the claimant and the District at the time of his injury. On review, the Industrial Commission…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. O'Dette v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Tipper v. Great Lakes Chemical CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Board of Education v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Ragler Motor Sales v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Village of Creve Coeur v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wren v. Reddick Community Fire Protection DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. Reed v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Flores v. Palmer Marketing, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Menard v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Jaskoviak v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API