Legal Opinion
Picard v. HSBC Bank Plc
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 28, 2011No. 11 Civ. 763 (JSR), 11 Civ. 836 (JSR)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.
Though it sometimes seems otherwise, not every litigant has the right to appear in federal court. A would-be litigant must first establish “standing” to pursue his or her claims, by demonstrating, among other things, the existence of a “case or controversy” and a personal stake in the outcome of the case. In this particular case, the Court is called upon to determine whether Irving Picard (the “Trustee”), the trustee appointed pursuant to the Securities Investor Protection Act for the consolidated liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Picard v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (In Re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Picard Ex Rel. Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC v. Madoff (In Re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- In Re Optimal U.S. LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Erausquin v. Notz, Stucki Management (Bermuda) Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Fox v. PicardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.