Gross v. Kierski
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Wallace, J.:
The defendant, a dealer in musical instruments, sold and delivered to the plaintiff a pianoforte, nothing being said *113at the time concerning the title to the chattel. This was in February, 1867. In August, 1869, certain persons, claiming and ultimately showing themselves to be the owners of the chattel, commenced an'action against Gross for its recovery. The latter thereupon gave notice to his vendor, the defendant, of the bringing of the action. In September following judgment passed against Gross. In October the pianoforte was taken from his possession, and in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vibbard & Abbott v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1821
- Miller v. Van TasselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Linton v. PorterIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by13 opinions
- Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- McCormick v. MarcyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Hodges v. . Wilkinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Rundle v. Capitol Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
- Hull v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.