Legal Opinion

Appiah v. USA-2255

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 18, 2023No. 8:22-cv-01165Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND EMMANUEL KUSI APPIAH, Petitioner, v. Crim. Action No. TDC-17-0635 Civil Action No. TDC-22-1165 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner Emmanuel Kusi Appiah has filed a “Motion for Habeas Corpus under Section 2255,” which the Court construes as a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In the § 2255 Motion, Appiah asserts that his 2019 conviction and sentence in this Court on bank fraud, aggravated identity theft, and related charges must be vacated because of a lack of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API