Kirkland v. Todd
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MONTGOMERY, Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action for a deficiency on a promissory note made by Bear Park, Inc., and guaranteed by Defendants. The deficiency arose after foreclosure of the deed of trust which secured the note. After a trial to the court, judgment was entered in favor of Defendant guarantors. Plaintiff appeals from that judgment. We affirm.
The trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and concluded, inter alia, “defendants’ obligation on the guarantee of [Bear Park’s promissory note] was exonerated by virtue of the material alteration and change in terms of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Spires v. LawlessMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Citizens Bank of Smithville v. LairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lemay Bank & Trust Co. v. LawrenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- First State Bank v. BensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wigley v. Capital Bank of Southwest MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Central City Ltd. Partnership v. United Postal Savings Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- American Standard Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. MayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Stewart v. KirklandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- J.B. Allen, Inc. v. PearsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.