Stewart v. Kirkland
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
Plaintiff sought damages against the Defendant based upon fraud. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff for $78,700.00. Judgment was entered in accordance with the verdict. Defendant appeals, presenting two points relied on.1
Defendant contends there was error in submitting two instructions and in denying Defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because a submissible case was not made. As the instructions complained of were not set forth in the argument portion of Defendant-Appellant’s brief, as required by Rule 84.04(e), the alleged instruction error…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Emerick v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- Grosser v. Kandel-Iken Builders, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Carlund Corp. v. Crown Center Redevelopment Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Maupin v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Wion v. Carl I. Brown & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chesus v. WattsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Rakes v. LIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICADistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
- State v. COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES MISSOURI, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Chesus v. WattsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Chesus v. WattsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.