Nottingham v. Nottingham
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, J.:
Each divorce action must be decided upon its own particular facts. Precedents are of little value except to furnish the guiding *460rule that- before the integrity of a marriage contract will be destroyed and the relation of the parties thereunder dissolved, the evidence of such acts as furnish grounds for dissolution must be so clear and convincing that the mind of the court will not be left in doubt and uncertainty.
The action was brought February 1, 1922. The complaint contains besides general allegations the charge “ that in the year 1915 this defendant committed adultery with a man…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- De Brauwere v. . De BrauwereNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Pollock v. . PollockNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Collins v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- McCarthy v. . McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Poillon v. PoillonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- O'Shea v. O'SheaNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- In re ColeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- In re BerardiniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- In re the Estate of BurdakNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of UsborneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.