Legal Opinion
James F. O'Connell & Associates v. Transamerica Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 30, 1991No. 10778-7-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
James F. O'Connell & Associates, James F. O'Connell, and Sharon O'Connell (Mr. O'Connell) appeal the summary judgment dismissing their complaint and granting Transamerica Indemnity Company's 1 request for a declaration it is not required to provide coverage for them. Mr. O'Connell contends (1) material issues of fact preclude summary judgment, and (2) Transamerica's defense based on allegations of misrepresentation is precluded by statute. We reverse and remand for trial.
Mr. O'Connell, a life insurance broker, sold insurance to Norma and Joey August in 1978-79. In the spring of 1984, Mr.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Meaney v. DoddWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Greer v. Northwestern National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Waite v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1970
- SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE v. GannonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Special Risk Management Corp. v. CahowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Chicago Insurance v. LappinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Security State Bank v. BurkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Security State Bank v. BurkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000