Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States Gypsum Co. v. McMichael

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 25, 1930No. 21151Published

1DissentClark, J.

The finding in the majority opinion that there was no testimony supporting the finding of the Industrial Commission is arrived at only by ignoring the testimony of the claimant, respondent herein, and two reputable physicians. The respondent testified as follows:

“A. On the 27th I loaded the car. Q. What kind of car? A. Box car. Q. Regular size? A. Yes; I don’t remember the capacity oí the car. Q. Is the usual capacity between 1,000 and 100,000 pounds? A. Yes. Q. Did you work regular in the box car? A. I never had this job very long. I had not loaded over three cars. Q. You had loaded three…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Utilities Coal Co. v. HerrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Blackburn v. Coffeyville Vitrified Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Van Vleet v. Public Service Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API